TIL: Closures in Groovy

I interact with Groovy solely because Jenkins uses it to define pipelines.

Pros:

  • It’s in the Java ecosystem
  • It’s a “real” language (turing complete unlike YAML)
  • It’s not YAML

Cons:

  • No static typing
  • Linters/formatters aren’t great
  • Jenkins is quite hard to work with and has surprisingly poor tooling

While updating some Groovy scripts, I wanted to update a utiltiy method to take a closure in a nicer way. The method looked like this:

def hello(clo, first = "John", last = "Doe") {
    println "Hello, $first $last"
    clo()
}

// usage
foo(clo: { println "I didn't see you there!" }, first: "Jerred", last: "Shepherd")

I’ve seen methods that look a bit prettier when called, like this:

def bar(someArg, Closure clo) {
    clo()
}

bar(someArg) {
    println 'hello'
}

Note that the closure is passed as the last argument. This allows the closure to be passed in braces after the method call. This looks quite a bit nicer!

Inspired by Xe's blog

Originally, I wanted to combine named parameters, default parameters, and a closure as the last argument. Unfortunately, this doesn’t seem possible. Here’s what I came up with:

def baz(first = "John", last = "Doe", Closure clo) {
    println "Hello, $first $last"
    clo()
}

The result of running this:

baz(first: "Jerred", last: "Shepherd") {
  println "I didn't see you there!"
}
Hello, [first:Jerred, last:Shepherd] Doe
I didn't see you there!

Groovy implements named parameters as a map. Unfortunately, it seems that Groovy is using the both the first and last parameters as a map value and passing that to the first argument.

// Groovy takes this:
baz(first: "Jerred", last: "Shepherd")

// and implicitly converts it to this:
baz([first: "Jerred", last: "Shepherd"], null)

// so, when calling baz, we're passing the map as the first argument and null as the second argument
// this leads to Groovy using the map as the first argument, and the default value of "Doe" as the second argument
Hello, [first:Jerred, last:Shepherd] Doe
I didn't see you there!

// instead, we want Groovy to print:
Hello, Jerred Shepherd
I didn't see you there!

Closures are still pretty cool, but it’s frustrating to figure out the syntax for how some of these features interact. Additionally, the feedback loop for Groovy with Jenkins is long, so if you don’t know the language, it’s hard to make progress.

Recent posts from blogs that I like

Xecast Episode 1: Origins and Techaro

Your browser does not support the audio element.

Download MP3

Also catch Xecast on YouTube (I'll make a proper podcast feed soon, trying to de-scope so I can actually get things done).

<Mimi>

These show notes were generated using Google Gemini 1.5 Pro. Should this podcast take off, we'll find a be...

via Xe Iaso

What can I do if IMlangConvertCharset is unable to convert from code page 28591 directly to UTF-8?

You can do the conversion in two steps using things you already have. The post What can I do if IMlangConvertCharset is unable to convert from code page 28591 directly to UTF-8? appeared first on The Old New Thing.

via The Old New Thing

Swimming in July

Just the pure physical joy of thrashing your arms around in water. To fill the kid’s buckets and throw it at the sun—the way the water falls apart into drops, and then into mist, the way a rainbow appears for a second and is gone.

via Henrik Karlsson